Notes
Griffin (Roger), « Fascism’s new faces (and new facelessness) in the „post-fascist“ epoch », in Griffin (Roger) et al., éds, Fascism Past and Present, West and East. An International Debate on Concepts and Cases in the Comparative Study of the Extreme Right. Stuttgart: ibidem, 2006, pp.54-56; Eatwell, (Roger), « Ten Theories of the Extreme Right », in Merkl (Peter H. ), Weinberg (Leonard), éds, Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century, London/Portland, OR, Cass, 2003, p.106.
Since the early 1990s, the Serbian Radical Party (SRS, Srpska Radikalna Stranka) has been the most important extreme right party in Serbia (cf. Irvine (Jill A.), « Nationalism and the extreme right in the former Yugoslavia », in Cheles (Luciano) et al., éds., The Far Right in Western and Eastern Europe. London/New York: Longman, 1995, pp.145-173., Pribićević (Ognjen), « Changing Fortunes of the Serbian Radical Right », in Ramet (Sabrina P.), éd., The Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe since 1989. University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999, pp.193-211., Thomas (Robert), Serbia under Milosevic : Politics in the 1990s, London, Hurst, 1999). Other extreme right parties include(d) the Serbian Saint Sava Party (Srpska Svetosavska Stranka) and Željko Ražnjatović-Arkan’s Party of Serbian Unity (Stranka Srpskog Jedinstva), which joined the SRS in December 2007 (http://www.blic.co.yu, 23/12/2007, accessed 30/01/2008).
Mudde (Cas), « Central and Eastern Europe », in Mudde (Cas), éd., Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe. London/New York, Routledge, pp.269-271)
Eatwell (Roger), « Ten Theories of the Extreme Right », in Merkl (Peter H. ), Weinberg (Leonard), éds., Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century. London/Portland, OR, Cass, 2003, p.68. An exception is the work of British psychologist Jovan Byford, who has published on the Serbian Christian right (« Christian Right-Wing Organizations and the Spreading of Anti-Semitic Prejudice in Post-Milosevic Serbia: The Case of the Dignity Patriotic Movement », East European Jewish Affairs, 32(2), 2002, pp.43-60; « Anti-Semitism and the Christian Right in post-Milošević Serbia: From conspiracy theory to hate crime », Internet Journal of Criminology (IJC), 2003) and more generally on the emergence of anti-Semitism in contemporary Serbia : « Serbs never hated the Jews: the denial of anti-Semitism in contemporary Serbian Orthodox Christian culture », Patterns of Prejudice, 40(2), 2006, pp.159-180; « Distinguishing ‘Anti-Judaism’ From ‘Anti-Semitism’: Recent championing of the Serbian Bishop Nikolaj Velimirović », Religion, State and Society, 34(1), 2006, pp.7-31.
To cite just two examples: In February 2008, members of Obraz prevented the opening of an exhibition featuring works by Kosovo Albanian artists (cf. « Obraz i policija u centru Beograda », 07/02/2008, http://www.b92.net/, accessed 27/04/2008, « Neophodna zabrana klerofašističkih organizacija », 09/10/02/2008, http://www.danas.co.yu/, accessed 27/04/2008, « Sprečavanje šiptarske izložbe u Beogradu », 07/02/2008, http://www.srb-obraz.org/, accessed 01/03/2008). A few days later, self-declared sympathizers of the same organization tried to prevent the promotion of a publication by contributors to the critical radio broadcast Peščanik (« Obraz na promociji knjige Peščanika », 12/02/2008, http://www.b92.net/, accessed 27/04/2008, « Obrazovci napali autore Peščanika », 13/02/2008, http://www.blic.co.yu/, accessed 27/04/2008).
Attacks on members of Serbia’s Muslim, Romany and Jewish minorities proliferate (cf. AI 2001, Byford 2003:5f, Stephen Roth Institute 2005). Sexual minorities are also targeted by violent extremists, as the incidents in connection with the 2001 gay pride parade in Belgrade illustrate (cf. AI 2001, Nikolić 2001). Frequent threats against critical journalists and civil rights activists (cf. GSA: Policija ignoriše pretnje, 22/04/2008, Pretnje smrću predsedniku NDNV, 05/04/2007, both on http://www.b92.net/, accessed 26/04/2008) can often also be traced to origins in the extreme right scene.
For a comprehensive discussion pertaining especially to Central and Eastern Europe, cf. Ramet 1999.
Griffin (Roger), « Fascism’s new faces (and new facelessness) in the „post-fascist“ epoch », in Griffin (Roger) et al., éds, Fascism Past and Present, West and East. An International Debate on Concepts and Cases in the Comparative Study of the Extreme Right. Stuttgart: ibidem, 2006, p.41; Betz (Hans-Georg), « The Growing Threat of the Radical Right », in Merkl (Peter H. ), Weinberg (Leonard), éds., Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century. London/Portland, OR, Cass, 2003, p.76; Ignazi, (Piero), « The Extreme Right: Defining the Object and Assessing the Cause », in Schain (Martin) et al., éds, Shadows over Europe. The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe. New York/Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.24-25)
Ignazi, (Piero), « The Extreme Right: Defining the Object and Assessing the Cause », in Schain (Martin) et al., éds, Shadows over Europe. The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe. New York/Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, p.23 and 25-27; Jaschke (Hans-Gerd), Rechtsextremismus. Available from www.bpb.de/themen/DU09IB.htm, accessed 21/01/2008, p.2). For a critique of the emphasis on the anti-system properties of right-wing extremism in many definitions see Kowalsky (Wolfgang), Schröder (Wolfgang), « Einleitung. Rechtsextremismus – Begriff, Methode, Analyse », in Wolfgang Kowalsky and Wolfgang Schröder, éds, Rechtsextremismus. Einführung und Forschungsbilanz. Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1994, p.9.
Griffin (Roger), « Fascism’s new faces (and new facelessness) in the „post-fascist“ epoch », in Griffin (Roger) et al., éds, Fascism Past and Present, West and East. An International Debate on Concepts and Cases in the Comparative Study of the Extreme Right. Stuttgart: ibidem, 2006, p.37.
Hagtvet (Bernt), « Right-Wing Extremism in Europe », Journal of Peace Research, 31(3), 1994, p.241.
Ignazi, (Piero), « The Extreme Right: Defining the Object and Assessing the Cause », in Schain (Martin) et al., éds, Shadows over Europe. The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe. New York/Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, p.25.
Krv i Čast was founded in 1995, the closely affiliated group Combat 18 in 2003 (http://www.bhserbia.org/interview.htm, accessed 14/11/2007). The Otačastveni pokret Obraz was founded in 1998 (cf. http://www.srb-obraz.org/, Hronologija, accessed 01/03/2008; see also Stephen Roth Institute 2005, Nikolić 2001, AI 2001.) The Srpski Sabor Dveri – Nacionalna Organizacija Slobodnih Ljudi started with a student paper in 1999 (cf. http://www.stari.dverisrpske.com/, O Nama, accessed 15/11/2007).
Several important aspects of Serbian statehood – territory, form of government, constitution, and symbols – remained unresolved until rather recently. Political violence, which culminated in the 2003 assassination of Prime Minister Zoran Ðinđić, also contributed to Serbia’s instability. Roger Eatwell (2003:50-58) called explanations of the rise and success of right-wing extremism that focus on such structural aspects „demand-side theories“.
Byford (Jovan), « Christian Right-Wing Organizations and the Spreading of Anti-Semitic Prejudice in Post-Milosevic Serbia: The Case of the Dignity Patriotic Movement », East European Jewish Affairs 32(2), 2002, pp.43-60., Petrović (Ivana), Lazić (Nikola), Klerikalna desnica pridobija srpsku omladinu, 2005. Available from http://www.razmena.org/sh/88/1/746/?tpl=94, accessed 25/04/2008)
This translation follows Byford 2003:6. Literally, dveri means doors. The term refers to the doors in the ikonostas, the partition in Orthodox churches which divides the sanctuary from the nave (cf. Kuburic:4).
The association promotes “national values” in institutions of higher education with the aim of introducing such contents into teaching and research as would “lead to the spiritual and cultural renewal” of the Serbian nation. http://www.svetijustin.cjb.net/, O nama, accessed 26/04/2008.
Cf. their site http://www.nomokanon.org.yu/.
These groups’ classification as extreme right, however, would need to be based on a thorough analysis of their respective ideology and activities which this short survey cannot offer.
A pun on rasa/race and nacionalisti/nationalists. Cf. their site http://www.rasonalisti.net/.
All three associations were classified as neo-Nazist by the Serbian Interior Ministry. Cf. Prvi zvaničan spisak neonacista (10/12/2005), http://www.b92.net/, accessed 14/11/2007.
Internet forums and blogs are the most important means of communication for the extreme right. See for example Komentar–Srpski Internet Parlament/Glas Desnice (http://www.komentar.org.yu/, accessed 30/01/2008) or http://www.vidovdan.org/, accessed 26/04/2008. On Internet use by the German extreme right, see Fromm 2007 and Schenkel 2007.
Krv i Čast publishes the magazines “Krv i Čast“, “Novi Signal“ (New Signal) and “Beli Vuk“ (White Wolf). The group’s newest product is “Obnova” (Renewal), whose first edition (with a focus on Kosovo) is currently advertised on the Krv i čast website (http://www.bhserbia.org/, accessed 28/04/2008). Srpski Sabor Dveri’s magazine is called “Dveri Srpske“. The association also presents a TV programme on TV Galaksija 032 (cf. http://www.dverisrpske.com/, 15/11/2008). The first issues of the magazine “Obraz” appeared in 1995 (cf. http://www.srb-obraz.org/, Hronologija, accessed 01/03/2008).
Between 1999 and 2007, 31 issues of the magazine appeared. Currently, the regular issues are published electronically, while the special issues still appear in print. Cf. http://www.stari.dverisrpske.com/, O nama, accessed 15/11/2007, see also http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Štampano izdavaštvo and Elektronsko izdavaštvo, accessed 01/02/2008. Special issues in the past discussed, for example, “Communist crimes against the Serbian people”, “Hate speech against everything Serbian” and controversial historical figures such as Draža Mihajlović, the World War II Četnik leader, or Nikolaj Velimirović, the early 20th century theologian, Serbian nationalist and Orthodox saint.
According to Dveri, its popular Thursday lectures at Belgrade University’s Technical Faculty are usually attended by several hundred people (www.staridverisrpske.com, Beogradska duhovna renesansa, accessed 15/11/2007). On other events organized by Dveri, see http://www.dverisrpske.com/, O nama, accessed 26/04/2008.
Cf. http://www.stari.dverisrpske.com/, O nama, accesssed 15/11/2008, http://www.stari.dverisrpske.com/, Aktivnosti, accessed 15/11/2008, also http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog sabora Dveri, Obnova domaćinske porodice, accessed 16/01/2008.
“Radi se o omladinskom pokretu za utemeljenje u crkvenom iskustvu i nacionalnom identitetu mladih ljudi koji žele da se stave na raspolaganje na korist svoje crkve i otačanstva.“ http://www.stari.dverisrpske.com/, O nama, accesssed 15/11/2008.
Members of Srpska Mreža include, among others, Naši (Aranđelovac, http://www.nasi.org.yu/, accessed 16/01/2008), Serbian and Bosnian chapters of the Svetosavska Omladinska Zajednica, the Sabor Omladine Justinove (Vranje), Nomokanon, and the SPC’s Odbor za Jasenovac. See http://www.vidovdan.org/, Srpska mreža, accessed 28/04/2008.
See Branimir Nešić, Svetosavlje i evropske integracije, http://www.dverisrpske.com/, accessed 01/02/2008, http://www.stari.dverisrpske.com/, O nama, accessed 15/11/2007, and http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Obnova Svetosavlja, accessed 16/01/2008.
Byford (Jovan), « From ‘Traitor’ to ‘Saint’: Serbian Bishop Nikolaj Velimirovic in Public Memory. Analysis of Current Trends in Antisemitism series », (ACTA), No. 22, published by the Sassoon International Centre for the Study of Antisemitism, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 2004 ; Byford (Jovan), « Canonisation of Bishop Nikolaj Velimirović and the legitimisation of religious anti-Semitism in contemporary Serbian society », East European Reports, 6 (3), 2004.
Ðorđević (Mirko), Srpska konzervativna misao. Belgrade, HCHRS, 2003, p.58. The text was re-published by Ihtus, a publishing company notorious for promoting right-wing extremism. Cf. http://www.dr-jurjevic.org/IhtusKatalog.pdf, accessed 27/04/2008.
Cf. http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Obnova demokratije i monarhije, accessed 16/01/2008.
Cf. http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Obnova parohijske zajednice i crkveno-narodnih sabora, accessed 16/01/2008: “U participativnoj demokratiji, u kojoj razna stručna i patriotska udruženja imaju svoj glas i uticaj, vidimo neophodno korekciju građanskog rata političkih stranaka koji je demolirao srpsku politiku.“ Dveri’s corporativism is also expressed in their slogan “Za nacionalnu sabornost u različitosti profesija!” http://www.stari.dverisrpske.com/, Aktivnosti, accessed 15/11/2007. Such ideas are resonant of ultra-conservative, clericalist regimes such as Austrofascism (cf. Tálos/Manoschek 2005).
Cf. http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Obnova demokratije i monarhije, accessed 27/04/2008): “Kraljevina omogućava nadstranački red i mir (…). Kralj je simbol nacionalnog jedinstva, štit pobožnosti i čuvar državne celine.”
“Ovo naše opredeljenje [for svetosavlje, BNW], dakle, nije mit o samozavaravanje o Srbima kao narodu najstarijem i nebeskom, već praksa svakodnevnog svedočenja duhovnih i moralnih vrednosti našeg naroda i odbrane njegovog opstanka na vekovnom životnom tlu.” http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Obnova svetosavlja, accessed 16/01/2008.
“Homoseksualizam i drugi vidovi devijantnog ponašanja, abortus ili sektaštvo za Srbe ne mogu biti normalne pojave i protiv njih ćemo se boriti svim miroljubivim sredstvima.” http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Obnova srpske prosvete, accessed 16/01/2008.
“Obnova našeg naroda mora početi od obnove vere, duhovnosti i morala, institucija parohijske zajednice i crkveno-narodnih sabora, pa preko obnove porodice, prosvete i sela, voditi u obnovu nacije i države.” http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Uvod, accessed 16/01/2008. References to a “strong and healthy nation” can be found ibid., Obnova domaćinske porodice.
“Srbija se zalaže za Evropu nacija kao zajednicu različitih naroda, kao zajednicu u kojoj se susreću i kroz koju se uvažavaju razne kulture (…).” http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Odnos sa drugima, accessed 16/01/2008.
“Mi ne mrzimo druge, nego volimo svoje, mi ne napadamo druge, nego branimo svoje.“ http://www.stari.dverisrpske.com/, O nama, accessed 15/11/2007, see also ibid., Odnos sa drugima. Specifically on anti-Semitism, see Boško Obradović, Trojanski konj antisemitizma, 01/12/2007, http://www.dverisrpske.com/, accessed 01/02/2008.
However, only the rights to life, property, education and equality before the law are recognized as “God-given”, basic human rights. Cf. http://www.dverisrpske.com/, Načela i smernice Srpskog Sabora Dveri, Obnova srpske prosvete, accessed 16/01/2008.
According to Obraz, Nebojša M. Krstić founded the publishing house Srbski obraz in 1994 with the support of the SPC. The magazine “Obraz” was first published in 1995. Cf. http://www.srb-obraz.org/, Hronologija, accessed 01/03/2008.
Cf. AI 2001.
Nebojša Krstić died in a car accident in 2001. His death aroused suspicions of a politically motivated murder among his admirers, who promptly proclaimed him a martyr of the national cause. Cf. Jerej Velibor Džomić, U večni spomen: Nebojša M. Krstić; Nenad M. Jovanović, Novi srpski mučenik; Bojan Mitić, Neustrašivi vitez krsta, all on http://www.srb-orbraz.org/, accessed 29/01/2008.
Cf. Nikolić 2001, AI 2001. Recently, Obraz again threatened to use violence in order to prevent public manifestations of gay and lesbian pride in Serbia. Cf. Homo frka, http://www.srb-obraz.org/, accessed 26/04/2008.
This, again, is possibly due to the alleged sympathies of high-ranking individuals in Serbia’s political establishmentfor Obraz and its aims.
Cf. http://www.obraz.org.yu/, Why Obraz?, accessed 14/11/2007. This website is now defunct. The new website can be found under http://www.srb-obraz.org/.
“Mi smo za Srbstvo sa Obrazom i zato smo (…) za krst časni umesto demonske petokrake, za slobodu zlatu umesto novog svetskog poretka (…).” http://www.srb-obraz.org/, Osnovne smernice, accessed 01/03/2008.
“Obraz je jedini pokret za školu sa verom, politiku sa poštenjem, vojsku sa rodoljubljem i državu sa Božijim blagoslovom.” http://www.srb-obraz.org/, O nama, accessed 01/03/2008. This phrase refers to a statement by Nikolaj Velimirović quoted ibid. See also http://www.obraz.org.yu/, Why Obraz?, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.obraz.org.yu/, The Basic Guidelines, accessed 14/11/2007, cf. also Mladen Obradović: Srbska mladost za srbsku Srbiju, http://www.srb-obraz.net/, accessed 29/01/2008.
Cf. http://www.obraz.org.yu/, The Basic Guidelines, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.srb-obraz.org/, Srbskim neprijateljima, accessed 01/03/2008.
Croats are referred to as “Ustaše”, Muslims as “extremists”, and Albanians as “terrorists”. The term “Cionist” is defined as “anti-Christian Jewish racist”. Cf. http://www.srb-obraz.org/, Srbskim neprijateljima, accessed 01/03/2008. Other “enemies” of the Serbian nation include “communists”, “fascists” (sic), “satanists”, “mondialists” etc. Cf. http://www.obraz.org.yu/, The Basic Principles, accessed 14/11/2007.
“In our glorious Serbian history we have never and nowhere subjugated nor persecuted anyone.” http://www.obraz.org.yu/, The Basic Principles, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. “God is with us!” Interview with Nenad M. Jovanović, Pravda, 01/03/2002, http://www.newsfromrussia.com/politics/2002/03/01/26725.html, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. “Nije svaki Srbin ratni zločinac“, http://www.pcnen.com/, 17/04/2002, accessed 01/02/2008; “Možda je poneki Srbin i Radovan ali nije svaki zločinac”, http://www.dnevnik.co.yu/, 18/04/2002, accessed 01/02/2008.
Cf. http://www.srb-obraz.org/., Srbskim neprijateljima, accessed 01/03/2008.
The Serbian Ministry of Interior Affairs and the Security Council of the Vojvodina Assembly classified Obraz as a clerical-fascist (klerofašistički) organization. Cf. Prvi zvaničan spisak neonacista, 10/12/2005, http://www.b92.net/ , accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.obraz.org.yu/, The Basic Principles, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.bloodandhonour.com/, World Wide Chapters, accessed 02/02/2008.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, O nama, accessed 14/11/2007.
In neo-Nazi circles, “18” stands for the initials of Adolf Hitler.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Osnivanje Combat 18, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Izdanja and Koncerti, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, O nama, Intervju, accessed 14/11/2007. On the same website, the cowardly assault of four activists on a gay man in Belgrade in July 2004 is celebrated as a good example of “leaderless resistance”. Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Vesti, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, O nama, accessed 14/11/2007. Only recently, Nacionalni stroj established its own website, cf. http://www.nacionalnistroj.org/, accessed 28/04/2008.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Vesti, accessed 14/11/2007. On Goran Davidović see also his website http://www.gorandavidovic.com/. Over the past few years, Goran Davidović repeatedly came into conflict with the law. In 2006, he received a one-year prison sentence for inciting hatred after he and other members of Nacionalni stroj had attacked participants in a public discussion at the University of Novi Sad in November 2005 (cf. Osuđeni članovi Nacionalnog stroja, 10/11/2006, http://www.b92.net/, accessed 28/04/2008). The sentence will be reviewed by Serbia’s High Court in June 2008 following an appeal by Davidović (cf. U junu o žalbama Nacionalnog stroja, 21/04/2008, http://www.b92.net/, accessed 28/04/2008). In connection with the Novi Sad incident, Davidović already served a seven day prison sentence for physically assaulting one of the participants (cf. Saslušanja i zatvor za neonaciste, 09/10/2007, http://www.b92.net/, accessed 28/04/2008). In 2007, Davidović was detained and later released by the police in relation with death threats against journalist Dinko Gruhonjić published on Nacionalni stroj’s pages on http://www.stormfront.org/ (cf. Goran D. pušten iz zatvora, 08/04/2007, http://www.b92.net/, accessed 28/04/2008). In June 2007, Davidović was found guilty of libel in a law suit brought against him by Gruhonjić (cf. Odšteta za povredu časti novinara, 25/07/2007, http://www.b92.net/, accessed 28/04/2008). In autumn 2008, Goran Davidović was interrogated by the police under suspicion of breaching public order in connection with the “March for Serbian Unity” (cf. Saslušanja i zatvor za neonaciste, 09/10/2007, http://www.b92.net/, accessed 28/04/2008).
Cf. http://www.b92.net/specijal/kosovo2004, accessed 04/02/2008.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Vesti, accessed 02/02/2008.
Cf. Ipak zabranjen skup neonacista, 26/09/2007 and Incident na antifašističkom skupu, 07/10/2008, both on http://www.b92.net/, accessed 27/04/2008. For Krv i čast’s version of the event, cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Vesti, accessed 02/02/2008. For Nacionalni Stroj’s version, cf. Goran Davidović: O događajima 7. oktobra u Novom Sadu, http://www.gorandavidovic.com/, Tekstovi, accessed 02/02/2008.
Cf. http://www.stormfront.org/, Stormfront Srbija, Aktivizam, accessed 02/02/2008.
Examples can be viewed on http://www.stormfront.org/, Aktivizam, accessed 28/04/2008.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Deset Principa Nacional Socijalizma and Lična Revolucija, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Biblioteka, Članci, Abortus, sredstvo planskog uništenja and Muškarci i žene, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Osnivanje Combat 18 u Srbiji, accessed 14/11/2007. The website hosts the notorious antisemitic pamphlet “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” (http://www.bhserbia.org/, Biblioteka, Knjige, accessed 02/02/2008). Copies of anti-Semitic publications such as Milorad Mojić’ “Srpski narod u kandžama Jevreja” (The Serbian people in the claws of the Jews”, ca. 1941) and Vasa Pelagić’ “Vjerozakonsko učenje Talmuda” (The Talmudic Teachings of Religious Law, 1877) can be bought from Krv i čast, cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, Izdanja, Brošure, accessed 02/02/2008.
“Samo su ljudi snažne ličnosti i volje spremni da žrtvuju sve i krenu u borbu za spasenje i preporod naše nacije i rase i rušenje cionističko-kapitalističkog sistema koji uništava našu voljenu majku Srbiju.” http://www.bhserbia.org/, Biblioteka, Članci, Lična revolucija, accessed 14/11/2007.
http://www.bhserbia.org/, Glavna, accessed 02/02/2008: “24. mart 1999 - 24. mart 2007: Osam godina od cionističke NATO agresije na Srbiju.” On March 24, 2007, Nacionalni stroj organized a public meeting in Belgrade to mark the eighth anniversary of the beginning of the NATO bombardement. Among the speakers was Goran Davidović. Cf. http://www.stormfront.org/, Aktivizam, Memorialni skup, accessed 13/11/2007. A similar meeting this year was banned by the authorities, but took place nevertheless. Cf. http://www.nacionalnistroj.org/, accessed 30/04/2008.
Obraz refers to NATO as “Judeo-masonic murderers”, http://www.obraz.org.yu/, The Basic Principles, accessed 14/11/2007.
Cf. http://www.bhserbia.org/, O nama, Intervju, accessed 14/11/2007. This is another parallel between Krv i čast and Obraz.
Cf. http://www.stormfront.org/, Nacionalni Stroj, Aktivizam, Program i statut Nacionalnog Stroja, accessed 13/11/2007: “Cilj Nacionalnog stroja je očuvanje i preporod zdravih vrednosti srpske nacije, kao sastavnog dela bele rase (…).”
Cf. http://www.stormfront.org/, Nacionalni Stroj, Aktivizam, Program i statut Nacionalnog Stroja, accessed 13/11/2007. Quotations: “Zalagaćemo se za unitarnu srpsku nacionalnu državu u kojoj će osnovna načela biti nacionalna sloboda, socijalna pravda i rasno biološka zaštita naroda.“ (pt. 5); “U korist jedinstvene funkcije srpskog nacionalnog tela, rasna i nacionalna svest mora ugasiti borbu među klasama i strukama u jedinstvu, od radnika i seljaka do intelektualaca, da svako vrši svoju funkciju u organskoj narodnoj zajednici.“ (pt. 26) Again, the similarity to Obraz’s programme is striking, the one main difference being Nacionalni stroj’s emphasis on racism.
Haut de page